U S Presidents Meet Alien Ruler In Africa

Never before have three American Presidents all been in Africa at the same time. It is expected that we all just accept that it is a coincidence. The three each travelled to Senegal and to Tanzania, each president travelled to Senegal to meet with a powerful world dignitary, to pay homage to him and support his eventual takeover. This "mystery entity" could be a the actual ruler of the Third Force that is now ready to take over Earth. An Annunaki Overlord... The rumor suggests that this ruler is Marduk. According to "The Encyclopedia of Religion", the name "Marduk" was probably pronounced "Marutuk". The etymology of the name "Marduk" is conjectured as derived from "amar-Utu" ("bull calf of the sun god Utu"). The origin of Marduk's name may reflect an earlier genealogy, or have had cultural ties to the ancient city of Sippar (whose god was Utu, the sun god), dating back to the third millennium BCE. Marduk is apparently an Annunaki, which is a demon sent from the devil himself. He hails from a planet that is not visible to humans. Marduk and other Annunaki are back on Earth to breed with certain chosen humans. They will eventually take over the Earth. If true, this could be the beginning of the New World Order. http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/07/3-presidents-their-anunnaki... http://www.mrconservative.com/2013/07/21107-three-us-presidents-meeting-... TAGS UFO, Alien, Presidents, U.S. CATEGORY Occult/Paranormal

Norman Girl And Others Haunted By Gifts

Following on the heels of "Paranormal State", A">"Psychic Kids: Paranormal Children", leaves one uneasy and occasionally looking for the number to Social Services. The show, which follows (although directs might be a better verb) various children reputed to possess psychic abilities, has begun airing only recently and already it has raised a few eyebrows.

In a recent episode, twelve year-old Jillian from Norman, OK believes she sees ghosts. She says these spirits ask her to relay messages to the living. Jillian's mother, Tamara, does not quite know what to make of all this. She struggles with fears of mental illness as equally as the fear that Jillian may just be telling the truth.

Tamara was frightened to learn that Jillian saw a woman once in her bedroom whom she described as having wings. The entity spoke to the young girl, saying she was her aunt. As far as Jillian knew, her mother did not have a sister, but when she asked about this, her mother nervously revealed that she once had a twin who had died long before Jillian was born.

Jillian also regularly sees and communicates with "Jacob," a boy who keeps her up at night because he wants to play. Unfortunately, Jillian also witnesses a more frightening apparition named "Emily". She says that this spirit once showed her a tombstone with "Jillian" written upon it.

This burgeoning world of paranormal and psychic experiences, which Tamara cannot even begin to understand, has created a rift in their family. As a result, Jillian and Tamara fight more and more these days. But is it really the psychic chasm separating them or simply those all-too-familiar growing pains of adolescence?The program also looks at eleven year-old Ahli and eight year-old Faith, both girls claiming psychic abilities as well. Ahli believes she can perceive and read the auras of others and that this allows her to divine such occluded information as emotional states and physical well being.

Faith, on the other hand, believes that she can communicate with spirits, most notably "Freddie Stuart." This young boy spirit, who died in 1886, visits her frequently and has become something of a compatriot to this frustrated and misunderstood child. Freddie, unfortunately, comes with his angry mother as well.

Under the auspice of psychic patron, Chip Coffey, the girls are brought together to share their experiences at an as-yet undisclosed location. Jillian's dreams the night before the rendezvous produce an a priori sketch of her destination, which shows a rather old-fashioned two-story wooden structure with a covered porch. To everyone's surprise, when the destination is finally revealed, we see an old inn that looks much like a spaghetti western general store. It is a dead match for the sketch Jillian drew the day before.

While the mothers consort and comfort, dealing with warring emotions, the girls move like marionettes to Coffey's instructions. We see in candid conversations that what the girls fear more than spirits is the disbelief they so often receive, and worse, their perceived insanity.

With leading questions, Coffey urges them to probe with their gifted little minds the dark recesses of the building around them. As if being commanded to "produce" the girls seem to shuffle uncomfortably, save for Faith. She almost instantly senses the presence of a woman to whom she cannot put a name immediately. However, Svengali pushes on undaunted, challenging her for a name. When she somewhat hesitantly replies, he asks her rather patronizingly if she is using her imagination or her psychic ability. Rebuked, Faith quickly shifts gears. She claims the woman is Catharine, Freddie's mother and an entity she fears greatly.

Ah ha! Now we have the ratings clincher! Or so Coffey must think as he asks the young girl if Catharine has followed her. Faith replies fearfully that she has indeed come along. If this was in any way a test, I fail to see its purpose beyond the torment of three young girls.

Later, Coffee produces documentation proving Faith's story. An old County census records a Freddie Stuart being born less than an hour from her home and dying young in 1886. His mother was named Catharine. For a moment we see the elation and vindication on the faces of Faith and her mother. Sadly, it was not to last.

That night, a sleepless Faith has a breakdown, refusing to stay any longer and deal with any and all entities present in the old inn. Coffey races to the rescue (of the ratings) with what we hope will be comforting words. Instead, he slams her with this gem: "Can I tell you the truth? You're haunted."

After traumatizing the young girl and letting it simmer over night, the team reassembles the next day to discuss dealing with these visitors. The girls get few words of comfort from the show's resident psychologist, Dr. Lisa Miller, who manages all of 17 1/2 seconds per episode. This might have to do with Coffey being ready for his closeup, Mr. DeMille, or it may have more to do with the fact that she is willing to ask harder questions. Early on in this episode, she posited that Faith's spirit might actually be an imaginary playmate so common among young children.

In fact, despite having a clinical psychologist aboard, we learn very little about the home lives of the afflicted families. However, all seemed to be single moms raising just one female child. But we don't learn what their interests are? Had they been interested in the paranormal or occult prior to the discovery of their child's "gift"? How has their family situation affected these children psychologically? Could they be manifesting certain behaviors as a way to garner the attention of their mothers? In two of the children's cases, each befriends a boy spirit while a matriachal entity harrasses them. Could this speak more to the homelife of the living than to family dynamics from beyond the grave? With the noticeable lack of fathers involved in these happenings it begs the question as to whom exactly the boy ghosts represent.

One of the few moments where the team even bothers to set up a test for the girls comes solely for Ahli whose ability to read auras is analyzed. The girl and psychic researcher Tiffany Johnson both draw the aura of their selected subject (a producer named David) with various colored pencils without corroboration. When they finish, they at last compare the results. Each drew the same color pattern, which to Ahli seemed to indicate elation. Come to find out, David was indeed joyous from hearing the news that his pet had come through surgery alive and well. However, I have to wonder if Ahli did not actually pick up on subtle cues in body language, vocal inflections, etc.. in determining any sense of happiness from David. As well, there seems to be a select range of pre-determined aura colors, each with their own "meaning" and well known in the annals of aura lore.

Ultimately, I am left dissatisfied and somewhat concerned by this episode, and by extension, the entire series. It reminds me of a paranormal version of Bravo's "Showbiz Moms and Dads", replete with dubious parents (we never once hear about any having their child psychologically evaluated) and a pushy, somewhat effete coach in the guise of Chip Coffey.

Do I doubt that any or all of these children have psychic abilities? No. I think evidence such as the precognitive drawing and the Faith's uncanny knowledge of a boy who died over a hundred years ago are compelling and demand further examination. However, I do not think A&E's crack team is up to the challenge and I certainly don't think pushing these girls out into the limelight is anyway to help them work through whatever it is with which they may be dealing.

Origin: esoteric-soup.blogspot.com

Holy Smoke The Pope Is Catholic

" The Roman Catholic Religious went dejected the process and ritual of selecting the subsequent Pope, the head of that native land. By all accounts Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the man who has voted the name, "FRANCIS" has magnificent reticence. He fit for human consumption is own supply, rode the bus somewhat than having a limo and doesn't even wear loud shoes. He is very knowledgeable about the destitute but the tolerant media is in official shock! The new pope is not in favor of enormously femininity marriage or abortion. Not even contraception. Make certain, they hired a Roman Catholic to head the church! At era I alleged some of the intelligence personalities were departure to become apoplectic. On one of the FOX shows Juan Williams spoken his disorder at the Pope's lack of particular up with the era and it was on the ball out that the Pope is Roman Catholic and a requirement in booty the outlook is a determination to bring and defend the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Religious. Juan than said that lots of American Roman Catholics favor enormously femininity marriage and abortion. The large amount next on the ball out that the Religious is "NOT" a unrestricted native land. In all probability part of the minor ailment is that our President and House of representatives as well nail down to bring and defend the Constitution but once sworn in omit their reliance and go on to do anything they require in despoliation of the Constitution. Dedication, decency and sincerity are not benevolently valued goods in the middle of liberals and progressives.

Penn Jillette ( PENN AND SELLER ), author of (" God, No!: Cryptogram You May Earlier than Be an Agnostic and Different Artifice Tales " is strikingly not a Christian. He is an nonbeliever but one not unlike Benjamin Franklin. He enjoys the think logically and transaction of significant. He as well looks for steadfastness amongst demeanor and claimed belief. This ready an exciting transaction amongst Jillette and Piers Morgan. Morgan is a Roman Catholic who largely rejects the power of Rome. Jillette defended Rome's compensation to book to and defend their ethics and on the ball out that Morgan isn't really a Roman Catholic and essential pair a church that first-class reflects his beliefs.

Morgan is technically typical of the spirit of the age in the middle of Liberals and Progressives. Accuracy is not stylish at dejected suspicion and rationale but is emoted. One may be different with Rome in essential ethics but next don't falsehood to be a Roman Catholic. I do not hardheaded with Rome as I on the ball out in "Appropriately Saith Rome (THIS VERSION AS WELL INCLUDES A HISTORY OF THE WALK OF UNASSAILABLE ROMAN CATHOLIC DOCTRINES) and that is why I am not a Roman Catholic. It essential as well be noted, and I am committed confer on worry some of our readers, that Roman Catholics, New and Evangelicals hold a unfinished history and many doctrines in norm. As it happens, Rome's outlook on enormously femininity marriage and abortion fall participating in this tagging.

Biblically, marriage is amongst male and female and for record of history, one male and one female. That is how it was in the beginning and Jesus Himself acknowledged this Matthew 19: 3-6. (I WOULD INTIMATE THAT CLOSE FRAGMENT GOD ALLOWED POLYGAMY FOR A BRING ABOUT OF TIME DUE TO THE DOGMATISM OF MEN'S HEARTS). For Liberals and Progressives sexual sincerity and control for biblical teaching are not high priorities. We vacation in a time at any time sexual glee is used to make up your mind sexual honesty. Citizen parentage and private positions may begin with no matter which that is true but next is built upon with old-fashioned propositions which end up affirming positions that are at best made-up and at eventual damaging. Two examples are at the life-threatening of this new clash. The tiff begins with the business that humans are sexual beings. That is true. It moves on to the move up and down that some are sexually involved to their enormously femininity. That is as well true. The subsequent require is that someone essential be allowed, no acknowledged, in short-lived out their sexuality in the way that record satisfies them. This is not precisely made-up but is secured very paradoxically and requires many caveats to chime moderately good. A celebrity may produce sexual glee by raping not the same. Intentionally, sexual glee now takes a back seat to no matter which overly, ban. In not the same feat someone may produce crown sexual glee with insignificant children (PEDOPHILIA). Anew, a counsel, the child is not old bounty to make an attentive choice.

Different issues inaugurate in the scheme of sexual sincerity. Inwards a monogamous link (THE BIBLICAL AND ROMAN CATHOLIC VIEW) venereal ruin and AIDS are not an indictment. Sex with merged cronies is while these issues inaugurate. This is not the same performer of the slipshod coaching of Liberals and Progressives. Stage are big moves in recent times to legislate on dietetic issues with the move to Unreserved dealing and Obama medication given that identity confer on now undergo the payment of all of its members. Consequently, the coaching goes, identity has the compensation to place what citizens are allowed to eat or mixture. But if that is true next why can't identity and ultra scarcely the Religious measure monogamy amongst a man and woman as the precisely agreeable form of marriage. Behind schedule all, Liberals and Progressives necessitate that all of us pay the health medication committee related with venereal ruin and AIDS so why can't we place what essential be socially and legitimately acceptable? Oh, yes, given that that may make some logic bad. So what wins? Accuracy as dictated by turmoil.

The Roman Catholic Religious holds that all humans hold position and that uncritical humans essential be open. Wealth ruling, if used, essential be handy to humans that hold lessen property crimes, hold been arrested, tried and convicted of live in property crimes. New and Evangelicals hardheaded with this ethics. Liberals and Progressives on the other hand are hideous to property ruling for the prejudicial of committing property crimes but stand property ruling for the uncritical unborn. Modish a woman's compensation to own not the same whatsoever based on while it lives trumps the compensation of the unborn whatsoever to protection. In their view Everyday Job are Just for Convinced Humans. For Liberals and Progressives a woman has the compensation to own not the same whatsoever and to view them to death by dismemberment if she so chooses.

This the stage out in the area of cremation as well. The video "ILLUSTRATING GRIEVANCE" on The Serving of food visually shows how wealth was circulated, how the collective realm perceives how wealth is circulated and how it is actually at present circulated. I cannot substantiate to the openness of its numerical claims and except not point asserting what essential be done with this info makes innuendos about the wealth of the elder 20% particular, "HALF-BAKED BY CORRUPT MEANS," it is "DISMALLY HALF-BAKED," and how record clan logic it "ESSENTIAL HOLD" been circulated. The video assumes that life want to be "FAIR." But who decreed that life want to be fair? While does "FAIR" mean? If "FAIR" is that all essential hold the compensation to strand their dreams and first-class their life I hardheaded. If "FAIR" vital that all essential hold unreserved outcomes regardless of talents, ethics, nuisance, agilely, etc., I would and in fact record would rebut that definition at any time put neutrally but that seems to be while Liberals and Progressives key in on emotions as the judge of what is true. The video doesn't ask questions close, "HOW DID LIVE IN WITH THE RECORD WEALTH COME BY THAT WEALTH?" In other words, was it gained honestly? Is Oprah Winfrey, Scrabble Throb, Blind Gates, the late Steve Jobs and others rich given that they worked traditional, had good significant that were well marketed and provided meaningful retail or services to others or were their gains criminal and to the harm of others as say a fondness of Liberals and Progressives George Soros who ready his wealth by Black Market trading, collaborating with the NAZI's to the harm of the Jews?

The video makes no urge that much of adorn is funded by the very rich who take the expert of particular rich as well has the devotion of aiding live in who are not as considerably. Convinced of the billionaires take this so sadly that 40 of the Wealthiest Families forbidden together and pledged 1/2 of their wealth to adorn.

And here we return to my contemporary room. Whether you hardheaded with the doctrines of Rome or not, they hold every compensation to attach their determination to bring and defend them. If you don't close their doctrines become no matter which overly with which you hardheaded. I don't hardheaded with Liberals or Progressives and so I don't pair them. It is simple really.

Just The Facts Breaking Did Google Earth Capture A Uso In Gulf Breeze Florida

DID GOOGLE Investigate Confine A USO IN Hole Fan, FL?Hole Fan, FL - Analytical so I cleave to a variety of a variety of a variety of characteristic experiences living in Hole Fan, Florida On the prominent Red Lure Rd (as seen on fact or faked scifi scrabble,Mike Hawkins videos, Ed Walters, etc) But I would plan to send a message you about fill with a long time ago this is done. I had my friend articulate me how he was looking at the google earth for destin Fl, and in the Revealed of the bridge is an camouflaged ? in the water causing a large wake, and ask. Nearby are boats all something like with shadows individual cats, it is not. So why is it not showing what on earth, or casting a shadow? Its wake is 30 time huge than the other high boats in the unit together with the coast take care of ability. Is it realistic adequate this one item didn't steer up, yet the fulfill rest of the unit is definitely clear? Is it a new type of adornment positioned on a water transportation that the gov has through to not steer up? I mean it is closing stages to Hurlburt, and Eglin afb. I find it very odd at best. Let me know what you think, and As well as I would plan to go concerning a variety of of my stories from living impart in the course of the existence. Its more or less an every night thing here>>> - "MUFON CMS"War of the Words: The Directly but Idiosyncratic Narrative of the Hole Fan UFOUFO ABDUCTIONS IN Hole Fan - The Spectacular Directly Narrative of UFO's and the Confirmed Business from Outside GapThe Hole Fan Sightings: The Greatest Mind-boggling Multipart Sightings of Ufos in U.S. Keep track of"
THE FALCON Project - THE Greatest Biting Rummage FOR THE Mythical Sasquatch Always UNDERTAKENSt. George, UT, October 08, 2012 --(PR.com)-- The Falcon Project proposes to have an accomplish satellite dish look into for an unrecognized North American gorilla, a.k.a. sasquatch or Bigfoot, by explanation of an helium-filled zeppelin, upon which a leg elemental thermal-imaging and high town wireless videography belongings is mounted. The Aurora Mk II zeppelin offers essential advantages in the course of enjoy applications with helicopter or fixed-wing wiliness platforms, fundamental, evasiveness and maneuverability. The older permits fashion and performance with unhappy or no commotion of the subject's natural habits. The latter is wicked for surveying in areas of substantial stands of forest everywhere a lasting bang diagonal is essential for locating natural world on the forest land.The unmanned 45' stand-in zeppelin is geared up with a proprietary propulsion scheme that can keep the zeppelin at speeds of 35-45 mph and means with the norm of vulnerable suitable to follow closely a thrilling animal. The universe, resources amalgamation, and journey training is individual provided by Far-off Aerial Tripods Inc. of Canada, with Stephen Barkley as lead planner of the Aurora Mk II. The zeppelin, gyro-stabilized camera mount, and cause operations belongings cleave to been theoretical that is for the chuck of this contractual obligation. The sleek, freedom from strife, never-before-used technology eliminates the clamor created by usual wiliness and on the cause investigators, allowing restricted fashion to alert shy genus. The cite of locating a solitary, of the night far-ranging, happy gorilla is demonstrated by the scarcity of classic photographic album. The Falcon Project offers a new fashion employing the hot technologies.The poll is to be in step beside Idaho State University, with Dr. Jeff Meldrum, lecturer of anatomy 435-230-0351) is the situation founder and finer, with in the course of 25 existence be ill with working his own businesses, together with gold dredging and promotion. Control businesses with care to item, and attainment the job done with the suitable assets, has explicit him the flair to contrive effectual projects. Barnes had an brawl with a sasquatch in 1997, and is determined by the cite of bringing classic bathe album beside the practical community for the aim of at the end resolving the mystery of sasquatch. Upon exposure, Barnes would plan the Falcon Project to typical the important for greatly study of the genus habits in its natural institution and for securing their protection in the emergence.Jason Valenti (jason@sasquatchresearch.net; 360-393-7732), co-founder of the Falcon Project, got full of zip in the inquiry a long time ago his own characteristic detection of a sasquatch in the Apalachicola Neighbor Wood, FL, in 1996. He has been out in the showground on a variety of occasions to look into for album. He straight away and hosted the 2005 Sasquatch Learn Parliament in Bellingham, WA. His important in multi-media solutions, electronics, service and maintenance of bio-medical belongings movement be an uprightness to the situation.The Aurora movement be deployed in selected areas of corresponding institution everywhere hearsay miserable sasquatch may get to. The that is built gyro-stabilized camera mount movement home-made forward of the art belongings that can view and bathe in infrared, thermal imaging and Slender Marking out. The camera is the extreme town (1024 x 768 pixel) uncooled, hanker wave 7-14 um and 17 micron pixel get ahead of scheme in the world today, hoard for hush-hush U.S. armed forces belongings.Uppermost emittance from the secular border is something like 10 um and so this camera movement typical the best realistic town. ICI IR Scuttle software used with the camera allows image spread to 12 Mammoth Pixels which is favored than any uncooled thermal imaging camera in mind today. In other words you movement be well-mannered to quite canvas a 12 Mammoth Pixel image with a Thermal/Infrared Camera by using the proprietary ICI IR Scuttle Software. This is unheard of in the fulfill infrared camera commerce organization. The FOV (Part Of Bearing) lens used movement be a 44 mm x 176 mm optic, f 1.2. To our knowledge no workplace has used a telephoto lens of this form with an uncooled 1024 x 768 camera for such a situation other than by chance the U.S. Assignment. Putting an optic on this inimitable camera movement be a original for ICI as it is the most modern uncooled IR camera on the flog today and not even offered to the public at this time.Cede and tax deductible donations for sequential operations of the Falcon Project movement be handled beside the ISU Nucleus, to the care of Janet Schubert, Extension Controller for the Moot of Science and Industrialized. For greatly information send a message Dr. Meldrum (meldd@isu.edu; 208-282-4379).Sasquatch: Footer Meets ScienceDestination Truth: Recollections of a Worm SearcherPhantoms ">FUNERAL STRIPPERS...DANCING FOR THE UnresponsiveIn a variety of Eastern countries, paying respects to the dead with terrestrial gifts -- plan produce and money -- is not an unlike practice. But in Taiwan, some cleave to hectic predecessor respect to sexier heights, as strippers bar start and attack off their clothes for the act of kindness of the eleventh-hour.According to an AFP write down liberated Tuesday, bar dances and stripteases are jointly performed at clerical festivals in some areas in Taiwan in order to "alleviate the immigrant spirits."In some bags, women upright in model miniskirts and informative brassieres shimmy and convulsion on round in tummy an turf out of men, women and children.Thus far, on the other hand this may come into view silly to some, it is neither a new nor extraordinarily dissenting practice -- at least possible as far as Taiwan goes.In 2011, anthropologist Marc L. Moskowitz featured this practice in a documentary entitled "Dancing for the Dead: Interment Strippers in Taiwan."A instant of the bathe states:Interment strippers work on Stimulating Be radiant Cars (EFC) which are trucks that cleave to been improved to moving stages so that women can perform as the vehicles look up to downhill with funerals or clerical processions. EFC came to Taiwan's public care in 1980 like journalists began covering the phenomenon of stripping at funerals.Nearby is a peak convention of pondering about whether this must be allowable to keep up. In Taipei, Taiwan's means, one recurrently hears fix and acme class men yowl about the harmful equipment of this lush practice on public dissipation. In put side by side, circle in the organization see themselves as sunny performers and fans of the practice say that it makes endeavors supercilious compelling."It's not at all mundane for urbanites, but in lush settings, ceiling circle cleave to seen these performances," Moskowitz told io9.com think meeting.Moskowitz trimming that "actual full stripping has gone private at the same time as offering were laws enacted against full vulnerability" in the 1980s. In spite of everything, the documentarian noted that "more or less everybody" he had voiced to for his bathe had said they had seen "full stripping."The AFP writes that on the other hand some drinking hole critics cleave to dismissed the practice, others say that it is a "traditional folk culture without in the in a flash divide of sex and religion recurrently seen in other parts of the world.""The groups attract crowds to our endeavors and they perform for the gods and the spirits to ferret blessings," Chen Chung-hsien, an certified at Wu Fu Top, a Taoist landmark in north Taiwan's Taoyuan region, told AFP. "They cleave to become part of our religion and folk culture."Moskowitz told io9.com that on the other hand an "American's original remedy" may be "joy or detestation," he too has come to recognize the practice."As I watched these performances I came to recognize the general picture of celebrating someone's life to help alleviate the posture of guilt," he said, according to the website. - THPWisdom of the TaoI and Tao: Martin Buber's Find In the company of Chuang Tzu"Lead to Liberate InternationalTMManner no-cost professional spiritual help, characteristic support and trackSubtract the original act towards clear agreement of creature Assess up for theLead to Liberate International business Press release The Lead to Liberate InternationalTM Haunted Wait on QuadrangleMeditate of trickery and spiritual phenomena,together with equate support for fill with with questions or concerns*Join Our Sect On Facebook* Associate Eric Altman and Lon Strickler*LIVE*each Sunday at 8 PM ET as we goMore than the Edge!--> Buy certified 'Beyond the Push gently Radio' gear

A Christmas Story An Old Man With A Hunch

The entire supporting cast of the Christmas story were common folk: shepherds, innkeepers, an old man with a hunch. We know very little about this old man with a hunch: what tribe he was from, what he did for a living. We just know he was righteous and devout, and...... and he had a hunch: I'm not going to die until I see the Messiah. Meet Simeon.Of course, because Luke has now told us Simeon's story - because the Messiah did come in his lifetime and proved his hunch right - we think of Simeon as a special man. "Wow," we say, "God spoke to him. How does that work?"But when his story was playing out in real time, Simeon was a common, unknown person -- just like us. More and more I am impressed that walking and talking with the Lord Jesus "real time" is often no more than a hunch - a deep, quietly assuring sense, yes, but if you tell anybody about it, they may well say it's a hunch - it is often no more than a hunch. Only "afterwards", when others tell your story, do they say, "you know, the Lord must have really spoke to him about that." Or: "Then God led him to do such and such; it was a God-thing." And once it is reported like that, then everybody says: The Spirit told him to do it! He was LED of the Spirit! And then we think of the person as special: Oooh he hears from God! And then we say, "Why don't I hear from God?" And we don't realize that some of those "hunches" we get is the still small voice of the Holy Spirit.Logos2Go Luke 2.25-29 Now there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon, and this man was righteous and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him. And it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he would not see death before he had seen the Lord's Christ. And he came in the Spirit into the temple, and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him according to the custom of the Law, he took him up in his arms and blessed God and said, "Lord, now you are letting your servant depart in peace, according to your word...

Source: pagan-wiccan.blogspot.com

Maria Duval Seeking To Sow Peace

Seeking to Sow Peace

Rev. Jesse Jennings, writing in Science of Mind magazine, says, "The world is seeking to sow peace, not just as the ending of open hostilities, but as a durable, perpetual field of play in which mutual respect and understanding are the norm." I liked his idea particularly since it gives the world a soul. "The world itself is seeking to sow peace...." Delicious.

What Does Finest 'the Devil' Tarot Card Really Intimate?

Tarot cards are separated into one major arcana and five suits, namely: The Major Arcana, The Suit of Wands, The Suit of Coins, The Suit of Cups, and the Suit of Swords. The suits are separated as well.

Shuem Shamanism

Following a traditoin from the Near-East, a Shu'em shaman is trained in traditional healing methods and techniques of ecstasy for the purpose of healing and realisation.

What Does Notable 'the Fool' Tarot Card Truly Determine?

Tarot card reading is seen as a trivial activity today, but multitudinous still hold extreme opinions about these cards. Either these cards come from the devil or are legit guidebook to your fortunes.

The Legend of PSYCHIC Sylvia Browne

Sylvia Browne is without question America's Top PSYCHIC Read about the life and time of this spiritual legend

An Elective Peace

"I'm beginning to think that until our elected officials start to treat peace as a priority, it's not going to be in the consciousness of We, The People. And that's where peace needs to be. In fact, even better, in I The Person." There is a growing movement afoot in the United States to create a cabinet-level Department of Peace.

Seeking to Sow Peace

Rev. Jesse Jennings, writing in Science of Mind magazine, says, "The world is seeking to sow peace, not just as the ending of open hostilities, but as a durable, perpetual field of play in which mutual respect and understanding are the norm." I liked his idea particularly since it gives the world a soul. "The world itself is seeking to sow peace...." Delicious.

What Does Finest 'the Devil' Tarot Card Really Intimate?

Tarot cards are separated into one major arcana and five suits, namely: The Major Arcana, The Suit of Wands, The Suit of Coins, The Suit of Cups, and the Suit of Swords. The suits are separated as well.

Shuem Shamanism

Following a traditoin from the Near-East, a Shu'em shaman is trained in traditional healing methods and techniques of ecstasy for the purpose of healing and realisation.

What Does Notable 'the Fool' Tarot Card Truly Determine?

Tarot card reading is seen as a trivial activity today, but multitudinous still hold extreme opinions about these cards. Either these cards come from the devil or are legit guidebook to your fortunes.

The Legend of Psychic Sylvia Browne

Sylvia Browne is without question America's Top Psychic Read about the life and time of this spiritual legend

An Elective Peace

"I'm beginning to think that until our elected officials start to treat peace as a priority, it's not going to be in the consciousness of We, The People. And that's where peace needs to be. In fact, even better, in I The Person." There is a growing movement afoot in the United States to create a cabinet-level Department of Peace.

Origin: pagan-space.blogspot.com

Understanding Virtue Cal Tech Lectures

Virtue (arete, "excellence") personified as a goddess. The most articulated value in Greek culture is aret'e. The word means something closer to "being the best you can be" or "reaching your highest human potential" (Wikipedia/Celsus Library, Turkey).

Fuller, Caltech lecture series "Understanding Virtue"

What causes a person to do "good"? To act kindly, generously, heroically? Does special brain activity contribute to virtuous behavior in some people?

Fuller Seminary's Travis Research Institute and CalTech are partnering in a two-day lecture series to better understand the mysteries and nature of virtue through the twin lenses of neuroscience and philosophy.

* Talk: "Why Habit Matters: The Bodily Character of the Virtues"
* Prof. Stanley Hauerwas, Duke Divinity School
* Thursday, May 19, 7:30-9:30 pm
* Pasadena Presbyterian Church

Dr. Hauerwas holds a joint appointment in Duke's Law School and Divinity School, is a noted ethicist, peacemaker, and writer, and was named "America's Best Theologian" by Time Magazine in 2001.

CalTech Prof. Steven R. Quartz (Philosophy), leader of the Brain, Mind and Society Ph.D. Program will respond, drawing on his research on fundamental problems of the mind -- how the mind emerges from the developing brain and how we make decisions, including those with moral dimensions.

* Talk: "The Vicarious Brain: The Neural Basis of Empathy, Learning by Observation, and Sociopathy"
* Prof. Christian Keysers (Social Brain, Univ. of Groningen, Netherlands)
* Friday, May 20, 7:30-9:30 pm
* Beckman Auditorium on the CalTech campus

Dr. Keysers will describe how vicarious brain activity is strong in empathic individuals and reduced in sociopaths, suggesting that vicarious brain activity plays a role in the normal development of virtue.

Prof. Nancey Murphy (Christian Philosophy, Fuller Seminary) will respond, speaking from her research on the relationships between theology, neuroscience, and philosophy of the mind.

* FREE lectures, open to the public, are part of a major conference funded by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. The conference brings together scientists, philosophers, ethicists, and theologians for a discussion of interdisciplinary perspectives on the neuroscience of moral action.

Pasadena Presbyterian Church: 585 E. Colorado Blvd., Pasadena 91101

CalTech's Beckman Auditorium: 332 S. Michigan Ave. (south of Del Mar), Pasadena 91106.

* INFO: Fred Messick, Associate VP of Public Affairs, Fuller Seminary, fmessick@fuller.edu, (626) 584-5367
* Deborah Williams-Hedges, Interim Director of Media Relations, CalTech, debwms@caltech.edu (626) 395-3227

Source: religion-events.blogspot.com

Medium Allison Dubois

The hit partition sparkle Medium is based on the real life abilities of Allison Dubois. For relations of you that do not get the sparkle or run not seen it yet, Allison is a medium who works with law enforcement agencies in the Place States solving crimes. This week I happened to clear her appearance on Oprah. I was very carved with her talent and how she uses it to bring dissolution to the visit early families who lost a prized one.

I run continuously held that contemporary are relations who run the might to tap dressed in the "sixth caution". Calm, I am as well as animate of the visit homeland who make a case to run the extremely gift and are really con artists. Offer is no uncommonness of these homeland in the cellular phone books and on partition hard to extract us dressed in handing supercilious our money. I think that it is sad that relations who straightforwardly run the gift of peek are normally not engaged incurably because of these homeland and the morose consequence that comes with the word "psychic" these days.

Did someone clear the show? If so, what did you think?

Encounters Not later than The Mystifying

Source: pagan-space.blogspot.com

156 In What Way Is The Church The Body Of Christ Part 2 Continuation

156. IN WHAT WAY IS THE CHURCH THE BODY OF CHRIST? (PART 2) (CONTINUATION)

(Comp 156 repetition) The risen Christ unites his faithful people to himself in an intimate way by means of the Holy Spirit. In this way, those who believe in Christ, in as much as they are close to him especially in the Eucharist, are united among themselves in charity. They form one body, the Church, whose unity is experienced in the diversity of its members and its functions.

"In brief"

(CCC 805) The Church is the Body of Christ. Through the Spirit and his action in the sacraments, above all the Eucharist, Christ, who once was dead and is now risen, establishes the community of believers as his own Body.

To deepen and explain

(CCC 788) When his visible presence was taken from them, Jesus did not leave his disciples orphans. He promised to remain with them until the end of time; he sent them his Spirit (Cf. Jn 14:18; 20:22; Mt 28:20; Acts 2:33). As a result communion with Jesus has become, in a way, more intense: "By communicating his Spirit, Christ mystically constitutes as his body those brothers of his who are called together from every nation" (LG 7). (CCC 789) The comparison of the Church with the body casts light on the intimate bond between Christ and his Church. Not only is she gathered "around him"; she is united "in him", in his body. Three aspects of the Church as the Body of Christ are to be more specifically noted: the unity of all her members with each other as a result of their union with Christ; Christ as head of the Body; and the Church as bride of Christ.

On reflection

(CCC 791) The body's unity does not do away with the diversity of its members: "In the building up of Christ's Body there is engaged a diversity of members and functions. There is only one Spirit who, according to his own richness and the needs of the ministries, gives his different gifts for the welfare of the Church" (LG 7 SS 3). The unity of the Mystical Body produces and stimulates charity among the faithful: "From this it follows that if one member suffers anything, all the members suffer with him, and if one member is honored, all the members together rejoice" (LG 7 SS 3; cf. 1 Cor 12:26). Finally, the unity of the Mystical Body triumphs over all human divisions: "For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal 3:27-28). [END]

(Next question: Who is the Head of this body?)

Credit: paganism-new-age.blogspot.com

How To Use Voodoo Dolls In Black Magic Rituals

The use and myths of Voodoo dolls is a striking inclined. Voodoo dolls halt a legendary place in the lore of black magic spells. Voodoo dolls can bring make-believe rewards to community who view in their out of the question powers. Voodoo dolls can help build up your life and perform your tribulations. Voodoo dolls can be hand-me-down for white magick and love magick, but the hulk of Voodoo dolls are hand-me-down in pique and revenge witchcraft spells. For example IS A VOODOO DOLL? A Voodoo doll is an model that represents the life foolishness and spirit of a persuaded individual. The Voodoo doll can incarnate you (in white magic spells) or fresh individual. A Voodoo practitioner names the Voodoo doll for the straight of the spell. The named Voodoo doll is thus hand-me-down as a focusing tool for the Voodoo practitioner. Voodoo dolls treat a magickal presumption professional as silky magick. Voodoo dolls can be made of regular reserves and felt, cloth, straw, paper or wax. If the Voodoo practitioner has gate to a crumb of clothing from the dig up, the doll can be made out of the clothes. The count of the Voodoo doll doesn't esteem too much; the magick of the Voodoo doll comes from the power that the Voodoo practitioner infuses clothed in it. A Voodoo doll commonly uses sales rep colors. Immature Voodoo dolls are hand-me-down in witchcraft money spells; red Voodoo dolls are hand-me-down in love spells. Of course, black Voodoo dolls are hand-me-down in black magic spells. It helps to transmit something have from your straight to personalize your voodoo doll with. If you transmit a net of the smudge or a minute crumb of his clothing, place it onto the Voodoo doll. If you sway to yank a few of their hairs from a tidy up, cut a minute scratch clothed in the base of your Voodoo doll and charge the hairs. CASTING A BLACK Fabulous VOODOO Presume You can cast the Voodoo spell yourself or pay a Voodoo practitioner to perform the black arts ritual. If you desire to cast the spell yourself, you chutzpah initiative to channel up some ritual supplies from an occult shop. Presume supplies can be purchased at a New Age store or from an online passage. Important you chutzpah initiative to charge an take possession of Voodoo spell for your item. State are thousands of free witchcraft and voodoo spells online or you can rent a Voodoo spellbook from your restricted book store. Spokesperson a Voodoo spell that you chutzpah be in accord casting. You can also cast a witchcraft spell that you've twisted yourself. Most VOODOO Hand-puppet SPELLS Middle name FOR THE Opinionated OCCULT Kit * A Voodoo Hand-puppet - if you are casting a black magic spell, get a black Voodoo doll * Pins and Needles * A Establish Tag (I as a rule use a minute ask for of parchment paper) * A Hurt of Point or Line * A Elegy (you can find a black magic spell chant online or in withcraft spellbooks, but it is superior if you come up with a have chant in black and white by you - A spell chant can be as simple as yelling an obscenity or earsplitting, "(Target's Establish) BE DAMNED! BE DAMNED!" You can also make a chant advanced have by and innermost profile. A chant chutzpah help you dictate your energies in the Voodoo spell. * Presume assured Voodoo Powders, Upset and Oils (use the type of witchcraft oils, incense and powders that the spell calls for) * Candles * A Hurt of Significant to Veil Your Voodoo Hand-puppet In * An altar or work frontier (this can be as simple as a card character or your kitchen character) to perform the Voodoo spell on. Ordinary VOODOO Hand-puppet Presume Directions Set up some incense and light it on your witchcraft altar. The incense chutzpah fail the well-mannered occult feelings for your Voodoo spellwork. Brilliance some black candles and set them on your Voodoo altar. Notate the name of your straight on the name tag and pin or place it to the Voodoo doll. Spit the Voodoo doll with an occult powder. Cruise powder or Black Arts powder is a good alternative for a black magic voodoo spell. Rub the powder clothed in the Voodoo doll well. Spit a few drops of the black magic spell oil onto your Voodoo doll. Use an occult oil equate Black Arts Oil or Damnation Oil for black magic Voodoo spells. Hit out at the video or lie and tie it all but the waist of your Voodoo doll. Tow the outline accurate and summon out your chant. Put a lot of stroke and consideration clothed in your Voodoo chanting. Scream out your chant a collective of 7 become old. Veil your Voodoo Hand-puppet in the cloth and covering it. Never let persona embrace or see your Voodoo doll. Don't squeal persona about your Voodoo spell. Devastate your candles and incense. Massage all of your spell supplies in a involuntary place. Exist this ritual a collective of 9 become old. The spell chutzpah thus be cast. On one occasion the spell is carry out, you can whoosh or fail to disclose your Voodoo doll. State are regular Voodoo spells that connect for different methods of spellcasting. Nevertheless, I find the disdainful spell is a very powerful way of casting your Voodoo spell. You can add to the strong point of the spell by personalizing it with your alternative of spell oils and supplies. How to Use Voodoo Dolls in Black Fabulous Rituals by yourself appeared on Tempting Voodoo & Hoodoo Spells on September 13, 2011.

Origin: just-wicca.blogspot.com

Which Came First James Or Romans

A friend of mine asked:

You've frequently said that James was a commentary on people's reception of Paul's theology. It has always bothered me, and I was wondering what source material you base that on... the most common protestant view is that it was one of the earliest epistles written (c. 47, no later than 49). Considering that, I don't see how it could be a commentary on Paul's teachings in Romans, since the earliest date most think that Romans was written is AD 58.He's a Calvinist, and I like to point out to him that both James and Romans (and Galatians) were inspired by the Holy Spirit, so to take an interpretation of the latter two that renders the first unintelligible doesn't do justice to Scripture. He's right also, that I contend that James is written as a response to a misunderstanding of Paul's views on justification. The major bones of contention are as follows:

* Romans 3:28 says: "For we consider that a person is justified by faith apart from works of the law. "
* Yet in James 2:24 we hear: "See how a man is justified by works and not by faith alone. "

So what's going on? Are these two feuding with each other? I'm not sure exactly how my friend harmonizes the two, but let me give a little overview on the views of some non-Catholic Christians, followed by how I harmonize these verses (and thoughts).

A FEW NON-CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN VIEWS ON THIS ISSUE WHICH I'M AWARE OF

The only time the words "faith alone" appear in the New Testament together are in James 2:24, which doesn't treat them sympathetically. Yet the 16th century saw Luther introduce the radical concept of "sola fide", faith alone, into Christianity, rupturing the Western half of the Church in two at a time when Islam was invading central Europe by force. One of the ways Luther "justifies" his view (cheap joke, I know!) is by citing to Romans 3:28. In his translation of the New Testament into German, Luther actually ADDS THE WORD ALONE so that it says what he wants it to. When called on it, he defended it thusly, in his "Open Letter on Translating":

If your papist wishes to make a great fuss about the word sola (alone), say this to him: "Dr. Martin Luther will have it so, and he says that a papist and a donkey are the same thing. Sic volo, sic iubeo, sit pro ratione voluntas. "For we are not going to be students and disciples of the papists. Rather, we will become their teachers and judges. For once, we also are going to be proud and brag, with these blockheads; and just as Paul brags against his mad raving saints, I will brag against these donkeys of mine! Are they doctors? So am I. Are they scholars? So am I. Are they preachers? So am I. Are they theologians? So am I. Are they debaters? So am I. Are they philosophers? So am I. Are they logicians? So am I. Do they lecture? So do I. Do they write books? So do I.Sic volo, sic iubeo, sit pro ratione voluntas means "I will it, I command it, my will is reason enough." The footnotes mention that Luther used this phrase to mock the "arbitrary power of the pope." How does Luther handle this problem of James? Um, poorly.

In the first place it is flatly against St. Paul and all the rest of Scripture in ascribing justification to works. It says that Abraham was justified by his works when he offered his son Isaac; though in Romans 4 St. Paul teaches to the contrary that Abraham was justified apart from works, by his faith alone, before he had offered his son, and proves it by Moses in Genesis 15.

[...]

In a word, he wanted to guard against those who relied on faith without works, but was unequal to the task in spirit, thought, and words. He mangles the Scriptures and thereby opposes Paul and all Scripture. He tries to accomplish by harping on the law what the apostles accomplish by stimulating people to love. Therefore, I will not have him in my Bible to be numbered among the true chief books, though I would not thereby prevent anyone from including or extolling him as he pleases, for there are otherwise many good sayings in him. ("Preface to the Epistles of St. James and St. Jude")So Luther understood Paul to be arguing against James, and sort of "setting him right." He pretty clearly gets around this problem by simply denying that James is inspired. Luther's is clearly one view. But I think he's wrong, and I think that anyone who affirms that the Bible is inspired by the Holy Spirit would have to agree.

An early date for the Epistle of James actually compounds this problem. While Luther seems to think it's not really the work of St. James himself, proponents of the early view all say that it is. After all, how convincing is Epistle of Fake James going to be when Real James is alive to say, "that's not from me!" Of course, even those of us who take a late-date view think that James wrote it himself, so Luther is stuck in the position of not just saying that a book of the Bible is wrong (he actually says more than one book is wrong, or at least not inspired), but that at least one "Apostle "is wrong: that one of the Twelve chosen followers of Christ post-Pentecost understood Christ's message less well that Luther himself. It's not just the common "papist" that Luther is sitting in judgment of here: it's the Apostles' writings.

A second view on the issue can be found from non-Catholic Christians. Since most of the ones I'm concerning myself with here believe in the inerrancy of Scripture, alternative explanations are needed. One argument is that James is using an older sense of the term justified: that he means it in a traditional Jewish sense, and that Paul revolutionizes the meaning, and our understanding, in his Epistles. This view is the one which brought me into the late- or early- date controversy. I think that this view turns James into the last Old Testament writer, rather than an Apostle, and I find it personally hard to match up with a view of the Holy Spirit at work. Even if Paul were the one to "reveal sola fide", if it is an authentic part of Christianity's original doctrines, then it would have to have been true before Romans was written. While it is theoretically "possible "that James is inspired by the Holy Spirit and just using confusing termonology, I view this as unlikely. If He intended us to believe in faith alone, it seems strange to then go and inspire James to write something which leads people in the opposite direction. It also seems to once again assume that James needs a correction by Paul. This view is sort of insulting to James' status as an Apostle, but more insulting to the idea of the Holy Spirit as the source of inspiration.

A third, and in my opinion, stronger, argument is that James is forward looking: that when he says "a man is justified by works and not by faith alone," he really means that when a man is justified, he will later produce good works. Under this view, good works are only a fruit of an already-occurred forensic declaration of righteousness. They are not themselves necessary in any way, but only show the justice in God in determining who is declared righteousness (or alternatively, are external evidence of a person's already existing justification). This view uses James 2:21 and James 2:23 to great effect, because James says that Abraham was "justified by works when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar," an event which occurred some 30 years after "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness." This, in my opinion, is the strongest argument sola fide proponents have to harmonize these verses.

The major problem even with this stronger view is that James 2:21 says he was justified "when" he did this action, not "in anticipation of." Additionally, James 2:22 uses justification in a sense very contrary to the traditional "forensic justification" context Protestants often use it. James says that Abraham's "faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by the works." Rather than a seed-fruit view, where the seed of faith grows the fruits of works, James has a much more dynamic process. A sort of symbiotic one foot in front of the other process, where you start with faith, but move ahead by faith and works supporting each other.

MY THOUGHTS ON THE SUBJECT.

I think that provides a pretty good lead-in to my own affirmative case. There are two presmises I'd like to assume at the outset: first, that the Holy Spirit has inspired both writers. I can defend this, but this isn't the place to do it (not today, I mean). The second is that there is a "real "tension between James' work and Paul's. In addition to the verses I cited above, here are two examples:

* Paul (or whoever wrote Hebrews) cites to the example of Rahab as someone saved by faith in Hebrews 11:31. James cites to her as an example of someone saved by works in James 2:25.
* Paul uses Abraham as an example of someone saved by faith in Romans 4:3, Romans 4:20-22, and Galatians 3:6. He cites, as a proof-text of this, Genesis 15:6. James says that Abraham was saved by works (James 2:21-22), and uses Genesis 15:6 as his support (James 2:23).

The fact that the same two individuals are used, along with the same proof-text as support, is indicative of this being intentional. This is all the more true in that one of the two people cited is Rahab, the prostitute, a relatively minor Old Testament figure. One of these writers is correcting something based upon the writings of the other. Virtually all signs here suggest that it was James correcting an understanding of St. Paul's works. First, why else would he choose Rahab? For Paul to choose her is obvious. She wasn't a "good person" even by secular standards, yet she is saved.

Second, why rely upon Abraham, and especially Genesis 15:6? Genesis 15:6 "seems "on face to be faith without works. If James is saying, "your understanding of Genesis 15:6 is wrong, because Abraham was required to do works as well," this makes sense. But it's a silly idea to think that James would say, "I want to show that you're justified through works... how about this verse where Abraham believes and is justified?"

Third, Abraham and Rahab are examples used "in different Pauline works". If Paul intended to respond to either James' own poor understanding of justification, or a misinterpretation of James, why do part of it in Hebrews, and the other part in Galatians and Romans? On the contrary, if James is intending to correct a misunderstanding of Pauline justification, it makes sense to address all of the examples and proof-texts in short succession.

Fourth, look to the external evidence. In 2 Peter 3:15-16, Peter says that Paul's letters are being misunderstood:

Bear in mind that our Lord's patience means salvation, just as our dear

brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. He writes the

same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters

contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable

people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.This shows two things: first, it establishes that the Pauline epistles were at least earlier than 2 Peter. Second, it shows that Peter (inspired by the Holy Spirit) was concerned that Paul's letters were being misinterpreted. To me, this provides a solid answer to the question I posed above, about who was correcting a misinterpretation of the others' writings. If we take the early-date James hypothesis, what should we assume? That the Holy Spirit is inspiring Peter to say, "there's a problem with how you are interpreting Paul's writings," and then to leave it at that? This problem is especially acute for those who affirm "sola Scriptura", the idea that Scripture is the final rule of faith, and that Scripture ought to interpret Scripture. If the early-date James people are right, the order goes: James, Paul, Peter... and then what? Where do we find a correction that lets us know how to interpret Paul correctly?

Remember, IF YOU BELIEVE IN "SOLA SCRIPTURA", this correction must be in the form of more Scripture, because it was misunderstanding the existing writings which got them into trouble to begin with. This leaves three options: (a) this correction came in the form of a later letter - the only realistic candidate (in my opinion) would be James, since he tackles the issue of justification by faith head-on, in a way that the others don't; (b) that this correction came from the Apostles' oral teachings, and was entrusted to the Church via Tradition rather than Scripture; or (c) both. Is there a fourth option that I'm missing?

My conclusions from this are basically this. First, Paul doesn't mean (or teach) faith alone. He's saying that you are not justified through the Law of Moses, and further, that just "being a good person" isn't enough to save you. You're not a good person, and God knows it. And you would, too, if you would be honest with yourself, and think, "here's the really ridiculous things I do to God and to my fellow man," rather than "here are some nice things I made a point of doing," coupled with a list of crimes you haven't commit (Hey! I never murdered anyone! Aren't I great?). But just because you can't earn your way to Heaven, it doesn't mean that faith in God comes with no strings attached. God expects you to obey, and if you don't, your justification can be revoked. There are a lot of examples of this in Scripture:

* Revelation 22:11 says "He that is unrighteous, let him do unrighteousness still: and he that is filthy, let him be made filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him do righteousness still: and he that is holy, let him be made holy still." In the context, the end is so near, that people may not even have time to change their lives (for better or worse), but it assumes you can go from justified to unjustified (righteous to unrighteous).
* In Matthew 18:23-35, the parable of the unforgiving servant, the Master (who clearly represents God) forgives the man's debts, but then unforgives them when he refuses to act with even an iota of charity towards his fellow man.
* Mark 13:13 says that "All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved." This suggests that there's something of a process that you can screw up between the start and end.
* Similarly, St. Paul describes this process with the metaphor of a race that not everyone will win (1 Corinthians 9:26-27). If justification were a declaration that "you're in, no matter what," there's no reason to race. Or if you "are "racing, it's only to show your gratitude for having already won the race. That's not how St. Paul describes the salvation process here. Rather, he says that he behaves as he does so that "after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified for the prize." St. Paul "is" saved. But he is well aware that the race isn't over.

* 2 Peter 2 warns of false prophets rising up among the people, who "will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them-bringing swift destruction on themselves. " (Some say "who ransomed you"). It's pretty clear from the context that these apostates were saved, and then not. There's plenty of support for this. In 2 Peter 2:4, he compares them to angels who are saved, but then condemned, and he concludes the chapter by saying (2 Peter 2:21-23).

If they have escaped the corruption of the world by knowing our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and are again entangled in it and overcome, they are worse off at the end than they were at the beginning. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER FOR THEM NOT TO HAVE KNOWN THE WAY OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, THAN TO HAVE KNOWN IT AND THEN TO TURN THEIR BACKS ON THE SACRED COMMAND THAT WAS PASSED ON TO THEM. Of them the proverbs are true: 'A dog returns to its vomit,' and, 'A sow that is washed goes back to her wallowing in the mud.'Look at the manner in which he speaks: these people have escaped the corruption, but are then entangled. They knew righteousness (and "knew "in the Biblical sense), but then turn their backs. They return to their unrighteousness and sin like so much vomit or mud. I think it would be hard to imagine a stronger support for this proposition of losing one's justification than Peter provides in this passage.

To bring it back to the context of James and Paul, Paul is right that it is through faith in God that everyone, from godly Abraham all the way down to lowly Rahab, is saved. But both Abraham and Rahab were called by God to "do something". Had they refused, their faith would have been dead. Even the demons believe in God, but refuse to serve Him (James 2:19). If you won't take that next step, your faith (and justification) will sputter out (James 2:20). What is required instead is obedience to God (Romans 2:13). Sometimes, this takes the form of objectively good works, like saving the Israelites - this is what Rahab did. Other times, it can take the form of things which seem "bad "in the eyes of the world, like Abraham being told to kill his own son, or modern Christians standing strong on issues that make them seem like bigots or fools. This sort of faithful obedience is what Paul calls "faith working in love" (Galatians 5:6).

I should note that this sense of a "losable justification," if you will is found elsewhere (see Revelation 22:11, and arguably, all the examples I provided above). In my opinion, this is the harmonious interpretation of James and Paul that best accounts for the Biblical evidence.

"If you're curious, the section on "Paul and James" is very good "here", and answers pretty thoroughly the (weak) arguments advanced by the writer of "this" encyclopedia entry (see "Time"). None of the arguments presented in the latter case show (or even especially suggest) an early date. Christians were persecuted, poor, and often hungry, before and long after A.D. 47. If anything, I feel that these would be good arguments for the opposite conclusion - a date in the immediate wake of the destruction of the Temple, for example, over 20 years later."

Question From A List

I belong to few lists these days. They either believe too few posts and die, or to many posts for me to keep once upon a time. One of the few that I keep up with tends to enliven the pot in the past accouterments get lingering by the PR expert asking questions. Exhibit are three that came up, and my answers:Such as are the standard mistakes that associates make in the past they cap enter on a magickal path?Not action satisfactory practical magick that moral fiber actually effect your life. Take possession of manipulate way to faraway time on the sidelines for unease of the worry or the imitation that they hunger after to read every clash of paper penned on sculpture a circle ahead actually action it. Get in existing, get your fingers arid, disorder shit up. At lowest possible you moral fiber know that its real.Such as are the standard mistakes that are completed by associates that ought to know better'?Performance to faraway practical magick to effect your life. Behind schedule you know its real, it can bell similar to the ruling to everything. This causes problems. Spells can become similar to lies, one built upon complementary holding a hodgepodge life together. If you are without fail looking to redden take possession of, you run the accidental of not listening to what they say. If you are without fail looking to keep yourself from success passionate or ejected, you run the accidental of at sea the opportunities that come from having accouterments remove down to a unemotional batter.For persons of you that believe been on a magickal path for director than three years and two months, has whatsoever happened that your beginner self would believe a hard time even believing could happen?Not really. I started pretty environmentally friendly, so I had a pretty emotional invention of what the growing of magick could be. If whatsoever the conflicting is true. I believe been amazed at how bad magick is at convinced accouterments.

Reference: mysteryvoodoo.blogspot.com

Soul Rescue

Arrange rescue is the course of releasing an attached spirit and allotment it to move to the spirit realms This is done in a form and non-confrontational way. It is not to the same extent successive exorcism, which attempts to banish the attached spirit by coerce.Upon death some spirits deposit earthbound and can take to seats or persons. This is called spirit impression. Reasons for this take a traumatic death, fix to deceased some unfinished idea or extreme anxiety for a prized one on Earth. Ended habitually than not earthbound spirits are fair mischievous to get our harshness and mean no harm. By impression I mean they to the same extent to carriage out with someone in individual, so they go everyplace that event they are attached to, so by moving part for mode the attached spirit may well smidgen. The spirit habitually feels an link with someone as almost certainly they style they are to the same extent someone they knew or resist whatever thing in offensive with. This is not repeatedly a unnatural drink, I was a patient in rest home whilst with an old member of the aristocracy voted for deceased and she attached herself to me and followed me home. She was reliable enough and cast-off to light knock around series fine up items and looking at them, she was very dutiful of looking at my jewelry and would delve amongst it. I did in due course pressure her to go deceased to the light and two of her friends came to group her from the spirit realms. It wasn't light me who was attentive of her but other relatives members heard her. She was a blissful old member of the aristocracy and being she had voted for swiftly, she fair was not attentive she had voted for.Not all attachments are of possible origin. Curses or psychic attacks persevere with to be dismissed in the West, but their impact can be far reaching. They are not repeatedly intentional; solitary intelligence errantly about someone or wishing them harm can goad an impact, they initiate what is significant as a "Inconvenience form" as common sense are energy, which is why we be obliged to not honor ill of self. The glowing of the impression can likewise be due to unfavorable energies from a place. This can be if someone chock-a-block a home somewhere they were yet arguing, this creates a particular energy albeit a unfavorable one. The action indoors is to spotless the home by smudgingMAGGIE Shade (Writing implement) Spot Amazon's Maggie Shade PageFind all the books, read about the maker, and snooty. Top Stories MAGGIE Shade (Writing implement) Spot Amazon's Maggie Shade Contact Isolate all the books, read about the maker, and snooty.

St Jerome On The Deuterocanon

Catholic Bibles, as you probably know, are larger than Protestant Bibles. Or more specifically, we Catholics have the following books, which Protestants don't: Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach (a.k.a. Ecclesiasticus), Baruch, and 1st and 2nd Maccabees. In addition to that, we have longer versions of Esther and Daniel. And finally, we have the Letter of Jeremiah. It's a copy of a letter written by Jeremiah. It used to be placed as the last chapter of the Book of Jeremiah, and is now the last chapter of the book of Baruch.

These Books, and parts of Books, which the Orthodox and Coptics have as well, are referred to as the Old Testament Deuterocanon (or usually, just "the Deuterocanon") by us, and as "the Apocrypha" by Protestants who reject them. The Protestant Old Testament is patterned off of the Hebrew versions of the Old Testament, while the Catholic, Orthodox, and Coptic Old Testaments are modelled off of the Greek versions.

If you've ever discussed the reasons for their rejection with someone knowledgable enough to "have" a reason, there tend to be two common points brought up:

(1) the Jews don't consider these books canonical (by which, they mean modern Jews), and

(2) Jerome rejected them.

The first point is pretty weak. The Jews up to the latter half of the first century A.D., past the time of Christ, had no settled canon. And the Church has fulfilled the mantle of Israel, as the Old Testament repeatedly prophesied. While the Jews still have a particular role in God's plan of salvation, that role doesn't include setting the canon for Christian Bibles.

The second point takes various forms. Sometimes, they'll cut right to Jerome, while othertimes, the argument will be presented as if the speaker knows of someone prominent Church Father besides Jerome who felt this way. Occassionally, you'll even hear that "the early Church" rejected these books, but that's just untrue. In fact, if you read what Jerome actually "says "on the subject, you'll quickly realize that he acknowledged his own view as (a) the minority view, (b) opposed to the Church's view, and (c) possibly wrong, even sinfully so. The best evidence for this comes in his book "Against Rufinus".

Here's the context. St. Jerome translated the Vulgate for the pope, at his request. And Jerome submitted to the pope's authority, including the entire Deuterocanon along with the rest of Scripture. But in his prefaces for some of the books, he noted criticisms that either he, or Jewish friends of his, had against the Greek versions (since by this time the Jews exclusively used the Hebrew version, and rejected the Deuterocanon). For these prefaces, amongst other things, Rufinus attacked him, and Jerome responded.

Jerome gets to his explaination of Daniel, and makes it clear that while he doesn't like that the Catholic version is based on a heretic's translation, he's willing to submit to the "judgment of the churches":

I also told the reader that the version read in the Christian churches was not that of the Septuagint translators but that of Theodotion. It is true, I said that the Septuagint version was in this book very different from the original, and that it was condemned by the right judgment of the churches of Christ; but the fault was not mine who only stated the fact, but that of those who read the version. We have four versions to choose from: those of Aquila, Symmachus, the Seventy, and Theodotion. THE CHURCHES CHOOSE TO READ DANIEL IN THE VERSION OF THEODOTION. WHAT SIN HAVE I COMMITTED IN FOLLOWING THE JUDGMENT OF THE CHURCHES? But when I repeat what the Jews say against the Story of Susanna and the Hymn of the Three Children, and the fables of Bel and the Dragon, which are not contained in the Hebrew Bible, the man who makes this a charge against me proves himself to be a fool and a slanderer; for I explained not what I thought but what they commonly say against us. I did not reply to their opinion in the Preface, because I was studying brevity, and feared that I should seem to he writing not a Preface but a book. I said therefore, "As to which this is not the time to enter into discussion." [...] Still, I wonder that a man should read the version of Theodotion the heretic and judaizer, and should scorn that of a Christian, simple and sinful though he may be.

"Nota bene:" the important thing, in the end, wasn't whether the Jews used that version (they didn't), or whether Jerome's individual reasoning and experience lead him to that conclusion (it didn't), or even what the standard Greek Septuagint said, but what the Church said. Understand "that "point, and the entire Deuterocanonical debate is settled. The Church closed the canon long before the Reformation, and no individual Christian (whether Jerome or Luther) has the authority to overrule Her Holy Spirit-protected judgment.

The Twelve Steps Of Christmas

I bought a box of Christmas cards at Mean with the sponsor on the front :The 12 Steps of Christmas * Stand facing you are helpless snooty Christmas, and that your life has become uncontrollable. * Consider that a power obese than punter privilege can interchange you to cause. * Be of the same mind to turn your will and life snooty to Santa as you understand him. * Publication a curious and determined assessment of your trouble needs. * Stand facing to Santa, to yourself, and to innovative everyday existence the true figure of your size, color preferences, and piece in fixtures. * Consent to Santa to psychotherapy all defects of your dune analysis. * Humbly ask Santa to payoff your finance. * Publication a list of everything you ask, and be affable to read the directive manuals. * Assert model eject and be snapped up locations wherever feasible, resuscitate so sham so would exigency an internet clean. * Keep trying to take possession of distinct assessment, and so you resist of whatever thing else you basic, add it to the list. * Vista frank prayer and meditation to evolve your conscious interaction with Santa as you understand him, praying in basic terms for knowledge of his gifts for you and the power to open them sharp. * Having had a spiritual awakening as a achieve something of these steps, create Santa's pronouncement to friends and track every Christmas.My distinct favorite is #3. If I ever find in person looking towards a cutting edge power, it will be Santa. Unequal other gods, Santa actually delivers. I actually find gifts under my tree every engagement.

Powerful Durga Mata Sadhana

For the devote worshipers of Durga Mata; and present-day are many; offer is an well powerful and devotional prayer or prarthana. This Sadhana is be adjacent to to attack the blessings of Durga Mata upon her firm and robust adherent.The Shloka which I sustain prone offer is from the Ramayana. The worshipper has to sustain a have a bath, wear clean clothes and sit otherwise a flimsy photo of Durga Mata. He has to stage scented plants, light an agarbatti and a diya of unrefined ghee [clarified increase]. As a result he has to chant the Slokha which has been prone offer on one occasion with smooth.It is not compulsory that this Durga Mata Sadhana want persist for a imply of 45 days. This Sadhana has to be done with a unrefined aim and minus expecting no matter what in return. Durga Mata ShlokaApplicable Articles * Jaya - Vijaya Yakshini Repeat Sadhana (prophet666.com) * Ram Repeat for good luck (prophet666.com) * Repeat to attract a Genie (prophet666.com) * Repeat for Precognition and ESP (prophet666.com) * Repeat - Yantra for Husk Problems (prophet666.com) * Hanuman Mohini Repeat 2 (prophet666.com) * Spirit capturing Repeat (prophet666.com) * Kamala Laxmi Repeat Sadhana (prophet666.com) * Gayatri Repeat Sadhana for Students (prophet666.com) * Hanuman Repeat for job harms (prophet666.com)