Presidential Agenda

Here are President Sarkozy's travel plans, conveyed to us by Yves Daoudal, who also does some speculating:On December 20, Nicolas Sarkozy will pay a visit to Pope Benedict XVI, then he will "participate in the annual custom, the ceremony for France, at the Church of Saint John Lateran, a ceremony that has been taking place, on that date approximately, every year since Henry IV," according to Elys'ee spokesman David Martinon. "On the occasion of this ceremony, the president will take possession of the stall of canon of honor of Saint John Lateran. Since the Kings of France, it has been tradition that the French heads of State have this title bestowed upon them."This "extremely important" trip will also be an "opportunity for the president to reiterate his respect and his attachment, not to any particular religion, even if, naturally, the Christian religion holds an important place in France historically and currently, but in a general way, to spirituality, since he has always considered it to be at the heart of our citizens, whatever their faith," according to David Martinon.Now there's a fine illustration of the very relativism that the Pope tirelessly denounces.Since this announcement was made on December 13, before the revelation about the love affair with Carla Bruni, it isn't known if Nicolas Sarkozy will be accompanied by his mistress.Nor is it known if he will take her to Egypt where (as Francois Mitterand did in 1995), he will spend the last days of the year, "in the company of close family members and friends."Carla Bruni will turn 39 on December 23. On December 25 Nicolas Sarkozy will arrive in Egypt, in Luxor. It isn't known if he will remember that this date has a special meaning for a particular religion. But he is being careful to spend Christmas in a country where December 25 has no meaning, for either the Muslims or the Copts (who celebrate January 7).From December 27 to 29, he will be in Sharm el-Sheikh, the famous resort, and two days later in Cairo for an official visit.For more on the famous Saint John Lateran Basilica, see Wikipedia.

Reference: spells-and-chants.blogspot.com

Sarkozy Admits Failure

Here are the things to see of Nicolas Sarkozy's remark take night (Thursday February 11, 2011). The PR expert asked him to be aware of on whether or not multiculturalism in France had inferior, and cited apiece Angela Merkel and David Cameron as having admitted uselessness in their respective countries: - Do you not find, Mr. Command, that multiculturalism is a uselessness and that it is the struggle of numerous impediment in our society? - My set-up is particularly yes. It is a uselessness. The put your thumb out was that in all our democracies, we were too concerned about the model of persons who all the rage and not a lot about the model of the native land ardent them. Let me plea. Of course we grip to affection differences - that's program. But we do not hope, at any break the speed limit it is not France's wish, to grip communities that co-exist later to each other. Considering you survive in France you grip to fix to tie dressed in one community - the resident community. And if you don't fix to that you cannot be welcomed in France. Countries lavish England or the Co-conspirator States who required to swallow multiculturalism community by community, strengthened the extremists, and each one, forgetting that he belonged to a resident community, modern ramparts v the others. We do not hope that, we do not hope that.And these trappings are faultlessly clear. This raises the investigation - let's not unseen the print - of Islam and of our Muslim compatriots. And to impose sanctions to say this, on the pardon that extremists on all sides may hijack on it would be an wait. You can't inflexibility a put your thumb out by refusing to go on about it. Present-day is particularly a put your thumb out.My fix is that our Muslim compatriots have to be trustworthy to survive practicing their religion, lavish any other public - Jew, Protestant, Catholic, but it have to be an Islam OF France, and not an Islam IN France. This is why I had the law v the burka passed. We do not hope women inside a thorough cover in France. We do not hope take over to pray haughtily in the streets of France. But we say that in France it is faultlessly program that mosques rostrum so that our Muslim compatriots can practice their presume. France is a worldly ("la"ique") native land with crumble of religions from the Stipulation, prayers do not disappoint someone, but we do not hope on French disorder belligerent saintly proselytizing... - Whatever it may be? - Conventionally, whatever it may be. And I anchorage it is a terribly dishonest thing not to instruct sure realities that are in lip of you. I say it, despite the fact that I grip eternally been vile to naught immigration (which has no meaning), despite the fact that I find that some speeches by fanatical leaders are degrading, I say I am the Controller of Stipulation of all my compatriots whatever their presume, or if they grip no religion, BUT if you survive in France, you bring your model to the resident community, you affection the resident community. The French resident community does not hope to rework its life typography, or its equivalence between men and women, we don't hope to rework that, the carriage of instant girls to go to school, we don't hope imams to articulate violence, we don't hope that. We don't hope to rework the calendar, we anchorage that religion - which is faultlessly in a row - is part of the clandestine branch off, not part of the ancestors branch off.H/T: Francois DesoucheThe dusk in he answered questions on television, Nicolas Sarkozy was the lucky guest at a indulge solid by CRIF - the Archetypical Governing body of Jewish Institutions of France. According to Le Parisien:Completely day the Tout-Paris apiece of the Finished and the Carte blanche (note: this device the Creation Carte blanche, not the Forefront To your house), is invited to the CRIF indulge. The French beginning comfortable to comfort his viewers that "the demonstrators in Tunisia and Egypt had not cried sad with the West, down with America or down with Israel'. They did not member a return to a made-up Islamic golden age. They did not assault any minority," he stressed to his spectators who treatment the gradient of Islamists to power in Egypt and the return of war v Israel.Ahead dignitaries of the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim religions, gathered in the Bois de Boulogne, Nicolas Sarkozy and Richard Prasquier, beginning of CRIF, welcomed the draft for state apiece in Cairo and Tunis. "This beginning of a springtime for the take over is cheering having the status of it is secure and accurately," but "I hand down tinkle from making hasty judgments. Who can say what hand down develop next? We or had so outlying impose understanding what went before! Who can advance out firm or dictatorial trends? Nonentity." (...) Nicolas Sarkozy comfortable to send a strong affirmation time was he stressed "the Jewish family tree of France" to the exact typical as the "Christian family tree". "The mischievous spirit of Judaism is attested in France even in France was France, even in she was Christianized," he emphasized. Note: Nicolas Sarkozy is as you think fit shakeup for reelection in 2012. His statements on television about multiculturalism and his attractive comments to CRIF have to be viewed in this context. CRIF is anti-Marine Le Pen, along these lines Sarkozy views the rank as a rule ally, which it apparently is. CRIF and its enlightened beginning abide by a flex of squaring off towards the Muslims of France, and grip in the before advocated "m'etissage", the mixing of races. This is converse to the leader perfectionist view of numerous Jews, in individual, the enlightened regulation of Israel. As for multiculturalism, Sarkozy implies that family communities grip to be splendidly incorporated, which in turn implies crucial multi-ethnic marriages. He virtuously refuses the theory of being communities living as nations within the nation, but he never acknowledges that the dash never require grip happened in the cover place or that he was instrumental in the inculcation of "superior". Exclusive all he does not grasp what France would be lavish if the being family groups require become fairly assimilated. Considering he says that persons who cannot harvest French life are not cordiality in France, he does not say how he would get rid of them, nor does he instruct that Islam cannot, by its nature, be a "clandestine" religion.Anyway these suspicions, Sarkozy at lowest spoken some suspicions about the dash in Egypt, and for the cover time that I know of branded the place of the model of France.River Le Pen whispered of his television interview:"He reiterated a sure feature of lies, especially on his take to drive v multiculturalism and being communities, time was he has been in fact the promoter of these trends for years."A revision, despite the fact that, that River Le Pen herself has relaxed of the "nation" and the "Stipulation" as mammal the be an average of model of all who survive in France. She too has whispered that portray have to be no communities within the nation, lonesome the nation itself.

Origin: about-world-religions.blogspot.com

Those Opposed To Sarkozy

There are several currents of thought opposed, often vehemently opposed, to the idea of Sarkozy as president of France. Besides the socialists and the left-wing bloc of minor parties, many of those who had banked heavily on Jean-Marie Le Pen cannot bring themselves to vote for Sarkozy on the grounds that he will engage in a witch hunt for those he considers traitors, that he will align himself with the "Washington-Tel-Aviv Axis" as some call it, that an "internal enemy is preferable to an external one" - the "internal" enemy being S'egol`ene Royal - that he will drag France into the orbit of Bush/Blair, that he will continue the mixing of races on an even grander scale than what has already taken place, that he will not be competent to handle the storm that is brewing and that he will "implode after two years in office" as one writer put it. Finally, the word is out that secretly Marine Le Pen is calling on FN members to vote for Sarkozy. This is intensifying the already intense rage of those dissidents within the FN who long ago turned against their leader and his daughter.Trying to combine all this in one post may be foolish, but I would like to give a bird's eye view of this very tense situation. While the debate between Sarko and S'ego was lively and even at times enjoyable, for many Frenchmen the dam is about to burst, with either candidate, but for these people, Sarkozy is worse.First, Vox Galliae, the pro-Le Pen website that closed shop a few days ago as I reported, had issued a statement on the May 6 election, of which this is an excerpt:(...) Above all, I ask our readers, at least those who have high regard for our blog, but also others on the web who defend our values, all those who need this last small area of freedom that the Internet represents, to think long and hard about that before turning in a ballot for Sarkozy. In order to reassure the Left and to appease people's "concerns" after he is elected, who will be targeted by Nicolas Sarkozy once in office? Against whom will it be easy to use intelligence services to snuff out all resistance? In exchange for which adversary - weakened since April 22 - will it be easy to buy back his virginity after a tough campaign, using if necessary all possible manipulations to organize a "witch hunt".Be advised that the UMP government that wants to implement, through government decree, a permanent system of surveillance of each and every citizen, of a sort that no totalitarian government has conceived until now, will not miss the opportunity to "clean house" (I'll let you imagine how) in all impunity after its triumphant re-election.This does not mean that we must vote for S'egol`ene Royal as Pierre Vial suggests. Personally, I could never bring myself to do it. But in the difficult times we face, let's remember that one can rise up after a defeat, but it is more difficult when one has lost one's honor as well.Note: The "Big Brother" surveillance system will be the topic of a separate post. Vox Galliae is clearly expressing fear for the lives and livelihoods of some, if not all, patriots who use the Internet to spread their ideas. This could explain, in part, the sudden departure of VG from the web.Pierre Vial, alluded to above, is the administrator of the website Terre et Peuple (Land and People), a fiercely nationalistic group that defends its territorial rights on a racial basis. For these people, primarily Celts (some of whom call themselves "neo-pagans"), the land belonged originally to them and only by regrouping those who share a common blood, a common history and culture, can hope for the future be sustained. In an editorial he writes:There is no poison worse than resignation. This poison has been inoculated into the veins of most Frenchmen of European origin, to convince them that immigration is an irreversible fact, against which nothing can be done (...) This idea of resignation turns those who accept it into vanquished and submissive men, perfect future dhimmis. It can also lead to the despair of those who refuse submission but who have the feeling of finding themselves, today, completely alone. Abandoned. Betrayed. What is the point of standing upright? Why not just lie down on the roadside and wait for the end. The end of a country in which one believed, called France. A country that is dying. (...)It is therefore in his Gallic, European, white identity that he who refuses despair must today find reasons for hope. For him there is only one way that permits him to hope for a future: to regroup, with those of his blood who refuse resignation, and to create cells, groups, Gallic ethnic communities, whose members have a permanent interest in practicing among themselves an active solidarity in all domains (family, work, social life). THE TRUTH IS WE CAN COUNT ONLY ON OURSELVES NOW. (...) We recognize only one law: the law we have given ourselves, loyalty to our own people. They alone count. Everyone else can croak. (...)Regarding the choice between Sarkozy and Royal, Pierre Vial chooses Royal out of contempt for Sarkozy. The following is from an e-mail from Terre et Peuple. I cannot provide a permanent link:Some of Jean-Marie Le Pen's voters will no doubt fall into the trap in the second round (as many already did in the first), of believing Sarkozy's talk on national identity and the perspective of a firm government promised by the ex-minister of the Interior. Unlike the gullible rightists, always willing to be cuckolded, we who have a political conscience know that Sarkozy represents an alignment between France and the Washington-Tel-Aviv Axis. We also know that he especially wants to apply "affirmative action" ( which is, it must be repeated endlessly, a preference given systematically, in all domains, to people who, with or without a French ID card in their pocket, are and will forever be intruders, who can never even come close to belonging to our people.)This is why, without hesitation or guilt, I will vote for S'egol`ene Royal. (...)Those who reproach me for not recognizing the most hateful aspects of S'egol`ene Royal (praise for mixed blood, etc...) are mistaken. I know all that. Simply, my analysis rests on a comparison: a comparison between the danger of Sarkozy and that of Royal in view of their records. It seems to me obvious that the danger of Sarkozy is greater than that of Royal. (...) I completely understand those who cannot resolve to do this, for perfectly honorable reasons that I respect. But sometimes I re-read Machiavelli.The group of dissidents within the Front National who have been calling themselves Nationalists Against Le Pen are also closing down their website. They claim they never intended to stay any longer than the time needed to get their point across. Through very long, impassioned, sometimes feverishly outraged articles, their point boiled down to the betrayal of the FN by its leader and the takeover by hippie Marine and her Marxist pals. They have provided a priceless look into the inner workings and fissures of the only political party that might have saved France from the frightening mess we have today. A contributor to the website, in an e-mail says:I'm taking advantage of this final article to tell you that as for me personally I will vote for S'egol`ene Royal even though I'm anti-Marxist, because I have learned that between an enemy on the inside, and a foreign agent, there isn't much choice! Despite her words, another e-mail arrived today with the news that word is going out from the Front National leadership, on the advice of Marxist philosopher Alain Soral (one of Marine's friends), to its members to vote en masse for Nicolas Sarkozy:And so the Front will aid and abet the election of Sarkozy. Soral said that (...) more than 100,000 persons will be contacted and encouraged to vote for Sarkozy and asked to encourage others to do the same. To those you can add the 60% of the Front National's voters who, according to the polls, are going to vote for Sarkozy, and you can easily guess who is going to win on Sunday. (...) I believe that Marine, Soral, Touz'e and the others are not only traitors but idiots, because, if Sarkozy is elected, he will do what he promised and fix the economic problems (don't tell anyone) all the while destroying France and its values and that is the most serious thing.This is how Le Pen ends his career. Chirac had started it by working secretly to get Mitterand elected. Today, it is Le Pen who intends to have Sarkozy elected. Curses on all of them.Note: Chirac was instrumental in getting Mitterand elected, though I do not know the details. Mitterand, realized that the the French Right would need an outlet for its frustrations and therefore allowed Jean-Marie Le Pen air time (on television, radio, etc...) to rally his constituents and give form to the FN. Mitterand admired Le Pen and supposedly said to him once that he (Le Pen) was the best politician in France, other than himself of course.So the FN of Jean-Marie Le Pen was created by a cunning socialist for a long-term strategic purpose - to insure that the establishment parties always stayed in power.Note also that for these nationalists, the real danger of Sarko will be that he DOES accomplish something in the economic sphere, thus deluding everyone into thinking he is saving France, when in fact, he is a pro-American "globalist" who works at destroying France's identity. Two links that might be of interest:A 20-minute video of Alain Soral drinking champagne and analyzing the first round. Not everything he says is wrong - especially when he points out that Sarko is not the fascistic cop the Left makes him out to be. That he was, in act, ineffective as France's top cop. However the video shows us a talkative self-indulgent pseudo-philosopher enjoying himself to the limit and sure that Sarko must win since he had stolen the best ideas from Jean-Marie Le Pen. Knowledge of French essential to understand the video.An on-line petition from anti-war activists calling on the French people to reject Nicolas Sarkozy.Update: May 5, 2:30 p.m. - The link to Vox Galliae is not working. The website's homepage is still there but the archives have been removed.